Posts Tagged ‘cps dshs children child families family federal law defense’

THERE IS NO WAY TO WIN

April 4, 2012

For those of you first dealing with CPS, in my opinion, just don’t sign anything that gives them control of your children, don’t let them in your home without a warrant, and don’t talk to them. They are the enemy and they are not looking out for the children. They give judges false information to obtain warrants. Try and find out what information they said to get a warrant if they do.

If you don’t talk to them, they make threats. That’s all they are, threats. Don’t give them any information. They will twist it and rewrite it as they understood what you said, which is usually has nothing to do with what you were really saying. Don’t trust your lawyer. He is on their side too.  Do the research and tell him what you want him to do, don’t let him talk you into something you don’t want to do, or would even be the worst things you could do.

Fight and make them prove everything they say. If there was real child abuse going on it would be a criminal matter. If they can’t charge you with a crime, then there is no child abuse taking place. Don’t be afraid and don’t let them wear you down. Best of luck.

Advertisements

Will Anyone Help With a Class Action Law Suit Against CPS?

September 27, 2011

I am far from being a lawyer and have no idea how to really fight this section of our government, but if we don’t they will go on destroying families.  Please someone help start a class action suit against “Child Parent Separators”.  They traumatize innocent children all in the name of the old mighty dollar. We all need to put a stop to this, if anyone can help please do.   Thank you, Charlotte

cbliss@gmail.com

CPS PLACEMENT, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, FIGHT CPS, LIES, HELP

August 22, 2009

I saw this letter and I think everyone should think about their innocents.  Try to fight with what you can.

If I were to write a letter to an attorney in a new CPS case, it might go something like this:

You have been appointed to represent me as an attorney in the county juvenile court. Be on my side; I need your help. I am fighting for the release of my three children from state custody. I am innocent of any wrongdoing. The caseworker made assumptions about me that are false. My children need to be at home with me, for their well-being – mentally, emotionally, and physically.

While you are my attorney, please keep in mind that you are working for me, not for the county that pays you. As my attorney I expect you to give me the best legal representation available. I therefore request face-to-face meetings with you at least once monthly to make sure you are actively working on my case, and not letting it slide between the cracks.

I understand that many court-appointed attorneys tend to simply guide parents through the juvenile court system, advising them to plead guilty to charges to make things easier for everyone else in the courtroom. This is not the kind of representation I’m requesting. I’m asking you to be actively involved in proving my innocence.

I’m hereby asking that you take my case to trial and make the caseworker prove all charges. Since they are false charges, I think it would be in my best interest, and the best interest of my children, if I were to fight to prove my innocence with a full trial. Do not under any circumstances ask me to plead guilty to false charges against me.

As you know, parents involved in CPS cases have to complete a ’service plan’ yet many do so and still do not get their children returned. I would like to avoid doing any kind of ’services’ and request that you refuse all services, and/or force the caseworkers to prove the need for any services requested. I do not want to be in the position of many parents in these cases forced to have psychological evaluations when there is no evidence of mental illness, or forced to do drug testing when there’s no evidence of drug abuse. Please honor my request, protect my best interests, and see that my time is not wasted by unnecessary court-ordered ’services’. Of course they would also be a waste of taxpayer money. Do everything you can to resist these services in my case. As you are my attorney I’m trusting you to fight these issues individually and fiercely.

I expect you to be 100% aware of what is happening with my case at all times, and to inform me immediately of any changes.

I expect you to obtain and share with me a complete copy of the case file including all case narratives.

I expect you to help me compile substantial evidence to prove my innocence in this case by preponderance of the evidence.

I expect you to produce legal paperwork including a complete response to all caseworker reports, declarations supporting my side of the case, and other documents as needed, and to present those documents to the judge or juvenile court referee who hears our case.

I expect you to do everything you can to prevent my name from being included on the central index, blacklisting people from working with children. I am innocent and my name should not be included on that list.

Please respond to my requests in writing within ten days; I will need your written response for my records in this case.

Sincerely,

Name of Client

CPS PLACEMENT, COURTS, FALSE ACCUSATIONS, ABUSE OF POWER, FIGHT CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES

August 22, 2009

United States citizens who are naïve to the ways of the Child Protective System and the courts, or perhaps not wealthy or connected, may inadvertently find themselves subjected to a nightmare. Many entities profit from the time a child first enters the “system”. What are some of the techniques CPS and the courts use, why does nobody hear about this problem and what is the outcome for the children and their families? How children are suffering harm by those with a duty to protect them.What harm do children and families suffer as a consequence of false accusations of child abuse?.
Last year over two million American families were falsely accused of child abuse!!

!
It is not in any one individual state but is now a worldwide epidemic.I don’t mean to disturb you but I really want people to be aware about that subject, because today, tomorrow, in the next half hour, it could happen to us too!
Very few children in America are genuine orphans. Most have relatives, family friends, neighbors or godparents who could, and are willing to, keep them if they must be moved temporarily or permanently from parental homes. As we know, there is such a halo around “adoption” and states have received financial incentives for finding “forever homes” for the children who are made Paper Orphans by a stroke of a judge’s pen. The child is labeled as abused and/or neglected and therefore is “at risk” and usually that means more money goes to the people who adopt the child, usually the ones in the pre-adoptive home where most babies are placed immediately. Those people have a say and can make comments along the way, so they are very much involved and interested in interrupting any chance that the baby will be returned home. If the baby stays in a “foster” home for 15 of 22 months, as you know from reading, then the termination can be effectively automatic by federal law and state incorporation of its provisions and sometimes that’s the excuse….

Fight Child Protective Services Help

August 10, 2009

If you are having difficulty processing how a person can be charged with any negligence or abuse related to a child and not be found innocent if they are indeed innocent – let me inform you of the differences between criminal court and family court. In criminal court the law does indeed maintain that a person is innocent until proven guilty. The state or prosecuter has the burden to prove that the defendant is guilty, in fact they have to prove it is reasonably possible just to get the defendent into court and tried. Some evidence must be obtained of some kind, and an indictment is needed. Therefore, while it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime, it is more difficult to do so.

In fact, this mantra ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ is so ingrained in our minds as Americans from tv, movies and culture that we mistakenly believe this is the law in ALL courts, and fail to be aware that it is only the law in criminal court. This is not the case in family court, where child abuse and neglect allegations are made. In family court there is no burden of proof on the state, county or prosecutor. Furthermore, you are guilty unless and until you can prove your innocence. Don’t believe it is true? Call up an attorney, friend or judge, or do an internet search to find out for yourself. This is not criminal court, and all abuse allegations begin in family court. If found guilty in family court by a judge, you may be tried in a criminal court – but only after.

One more thing – you can be punished for your ‘guilt’ (being you are believed guilty until you prove otherwise) before you are even brought before a judge.

Now let me ask you….if I accuse you of hitting your children in an abusive way how are you going to prove otherwise? Testimony of friends, family, bosses, co-workers, teachers and neighbors? No one has ever seen a mark on your child, heard of any abuse claims in the past or seen you abuse your children…..so what? Obviously you are clever enough to hit without leaving a mark (how many of us from watching too much tv know that the ‘right’ people know how to do this professionally), and you are also smart enough not to do it except in the privacy of your own home. Your children say it never happened? You are terrorizing them and influencing them to say that. No medical records of any untoward abuse or suspected abuse? Well who would bring their kid into the doctors office for injuries sustained during abuse? You just didn’t bring them in, doesn’t mean there weren’t any injuries. Lie-detector test? Not admissible in court, and even if it were – who here fully believes in their scientific accuracy? Sorry – guess you can’t prove your innocence – no matter who you are.

Why is the court set up this way? In the supposed interest of the child. The ‘better safe than sorry’ motive. Many offenders are clever enough to abuse children without any clue as to their guilt. Better to assume guilt and take action until innocence can be proven. The problem here is this – if you are innocent, your children have been taken away and put in foster care, tramatized by doctors visits, the foster care system and social services….to start with. Is this really ‘safe’? And how is it not ‘sorry’ either way you look at it?

This is just the beginning of the terrorism of Americans at the hand of Social Services – and it is all perfectly legal – furthermore considered either socially acceptable, or out of the ignorance of most Americans, believed to be untrue.

Don’t Ever Trust CPS

August 10, 2009

State’s Child Protection Agencies Collude with Judges to Defraud Federal Government
© Nev Moore Jan. ‘02

In 1974 Walter Mondale initiated CAPTA (the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act), the legislation that began feeding federal funding into the state’s child welfare agencies. With remarkable foresight Mondale expressed concerns that the legislation could lead to systemic abuse in that the state agencies might over-process children into the system unnecessarily to keep, and increase, the flow of federal dollars. Shortly after CAPTA was enacted there was a dramatic increase in the number of children in foster care, peaking at around 500,000 during the mid-70’s. George Miller, the Chairman of the federal Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, initiated an intensive investigation of the nation’s foster care system after the effects of CAPTA started to become apparent by the soaring numbers of children who were being placed in foster care. An official at the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare admitted to Miller that the government had no idea where many of the nation’s 500,000 foster children where living, what services they were receiving, if any, or if any efforts were being made to reunite them with their families.

To address the obvious free-for-all snatching of children that CAPTA had stimulated, the Committee crafted new federal legislation with the intent of creating accountability and clearer guidelines for the states child welfare agencies. During the crafting of P.L. 96-272 Chairman Miller’s concern was that the federal government was footing the bill for warehousing children in institutions and inappropriate settings without accountability. In 1980 the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, P.L. 96-272, was enacted. The act included provisions that “reasonable efforts” be made to prevent children from being unnecessarily removed from their homes and placed in foster care. Although CPS has always tried to buffalo the media and the public that they are involved with families due to some sort of horrific child abuse or neglect, there has never been any debate among national policy makers, researchers, and federal agencies that the vast majority of CPS cases are due to poverty or frivolous/social reasons and do not contain elements of real child abuse. If the cases did actually involve acts of abuse they would be criminal, identified and investigated by law enforcement, rather than social workers, and would be prosecuted as such. P.L. 96-272 came into effect partly because Congress determined that a large number of children were being unnecessarily removed from their homes, and, once removed, they were lost in the limbo of foster care for years, many until they just grew too old, when they were then put on the streets at the age of 18.

The Child Welfare League of America testified before a senate subcommittee: “In fact, there were many instances then, as now, of children being removed unnecessarily from their families. It is important to recognize that children are almost always traumatized by removal from their own families.” So, accountability from each states child protection agency was also written in. To receive the federal money the states would have to submit an annual report to the federal government, known as an AFCARS report, that specifically accounts for each child in state care. ACLU Children’s Rights Project attorney, Marcia Robinson Lowry, explained in her testimony to Congress: “As a condition of federal funding, states must have a reasonable information system to identify children in federally-funded state custody.” These requirements were implemented in 1980. Up until 1999 some states were still not filing their federally required AFCARS report to the federal government. According to Jeffrey Locke, former Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Social Services, the excuse to the legislature was that they “couldn’t figure out how to
work their computer system.”

When I called Senator Therese Murray in 1998 to ask how many children had died in foster care in Massachusetts, her aide replied: “We don’t have those statistics.” At that time Senator Murray was the Senate Chair of the Committee on Health & Elderly Affairs, and therefore responsible to oversee the collection and filing of AFCARS data.

The “reasonable efforts” requirements were designed to address these issues by requiring the states child welfare agencies to have specific investigation and assessment policies to minimize frivolous removals, to provide “services” to address and ameliorate conditions that were detrimental to the child’s well-being; to place children with relatives when removal from the home was absolutely necessary; and make efforts to reunite families in a timely fashion. Methods to audit and track compliance with federal requirements were also built in. The states were to establish “citizen review panels” comprised of a specifically designated representation of the population which would include not only members of collateral professional communities involved in child protection, but “parents, foster parents, and former foster children.” Each state was to have at least three citizen review panels. The panels would essentially act as a standing jury of peers and would review CPS cases. Twenty years after P.L. 96- 272 went into effect the citizen review panels have never been established in most states.

Another means of creating accountability was to have the federal authority, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, conduct compliance audits, which are known as Section 427 reviews. The method of enforcement that Congress devised to ensure that the states followed the federal law was to provide incentive funds to the states that documented their compliance with the federal regulations. The states would self-certify compliance, but could be subjected to “periodic” 427 reviews by the Dept. of Health & Human Services. Were the states to find themselves in non-compliance they would simply return the incentive funds. It would seem that providing cash to agencies that are allowed to self-document compliance is a somewhat less than intelligent system. It would be interesting to track down exactly how much money the states child “protective” agencies have returned to the government because they found themselves in non-compliance. Gee, maybe this is rocket science.

Like CAPTA, P.L. 96-272 could only have worked if the federal government demanded compliance and meticulous accountability, and them imposed sanctions for non-compliance. Even better – criminal charges for racketeering for intentional fraud. Mark Soler, director of the National Youth Law Center in California explained:

“The Department of Health & Human Services has failed to promulgate meaningful regulations to implement the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act. It has applied even the minimal federal regulations that were developed in an inconsistent and arbitrary manner, and only token implementation of the laws protecting children.’

Even when HHS finds overwhelming evidence of lack of compliance during 427 reviews, no sanctions are imposed and they continue to keep the fed $$$ pouring in – in violation of their own regulations. Not so much as a slap on the hand or even token admonishment. Certainly explains how CPS developed their arrogance and contempt for any authority – because there is none. Their confidence that they are free from the feds insisting on compliance with the law is well illustrated by the foster care numbers which increased dramatically after CAPTA began feeding federal dollars into the states child protection agencies, then dropped equally dramatically after the enactment of P.L.96-272, which was supposed to create more specific federal regulation and accountability. However, once the state agencies saw that the federal government was not enforcing compliance, the foster care numbers soared once again.

Michael Petit, Deputy Director of the Child Welfare League of America, stated in his testimony before Congress: “A 427 is a meaningless process for most of the states. It represents no kind of sanctions to the states whatsoever for non-compliance.” Marcia Robinson Lowry told Congress: “States are passing HHS audits with systems in which no reasonable person could consider that children are being well treated. It is virtually impossible to fail a 427 audit.”

The initial concept of “reasonable efforts” was the only conclusion that any rational person could come to: rather than disrupt children’s lives, and traumatize them by seizing them from non- abusive situations and placing them with strangers (who are often no better, and sometimes far worse), assist families in overcoming their obstacles and problems by providing support and services. The idea never worked, though, because it has always been more profitable to too many to remove children rather than keep them at home. Rather than offer support and simple, practical services to families CPS forged contracts with vendors. Now private businesses, under the guise of “service providers”, could mushroom into existence knowing that their sugar daddy, CPS, would provide a never-ending flow of coerced clients. The market potential is unlimited – potentially every mother, father, grandparent, and child in the country. Rather than offering practical, meaningful services that are germane to the families circumstances, CPS clients are ordered to engage in “services” with CPS-contracted vendors; special interest groups who are dependent on CPS for their income and profit by maintaining the levels of children in foster care, and whose interests are protected by a bureaucracy intent on securing it’s own survival and protecting unlimited growth.

The extent of which CPS is allowed to continue to operate while being so far out of compliance with the existing state and federal laws is mind boggling. It would be a challenge to find any other agency in our countries history that operated in such gross and blatant violation of the law with absolutely no intervention from the administration. Tens of millions of tax dollars are being squandered on a system that is destroying families and causing lifelong emotional ruin to children – and those are the lucky ones who live through it.

The most egregious area of outright criminal fraud is CPS’s practice of filing their federally required documentation of compliance in secrecy through the courts. The federal foster care reimbursements are channeled through the Title IV-E section of the Social Security Act. Each states child welfare agency enters into a contract with the federal government, which is referred to as their Title IV-E state plan. It is this contract that spells out the responsibilities that CPS must, by law, comply with in order to receive their federal funding. To document compliance with the fed regs CPS must file a form through the courts in each individual case. In Massachusetts these forms are referred to as a “29-C.” 42 U.S. Code, ss 672 reads:

“These requirements are not mere formalities. The Finance Committee of Congress, in preparing its summary for final passage of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, P.L. 96-272, stated; ` The Committee is aware of allegations that the judicial determination requirement (sic: that a judge makes a determination that a child needs to be removed from the home) can become a mere pro forma exercise in paper shuffling to obtain federal funding. While this could occur in some instances, the Committee is unwilling to accept as a general proposition that the judiciaries of the States would so lightly treat a responsibility placed upon them by federal statute for the protection of children.”

1980 U.S. Code Cong. and Admin. News: “A judicial determination of those efforts (reasonable efforts, as defined in the Act) serves to closely examine, in the case of each individual child, whether reasonable efforts were made to keep the family intact.” In accordance with the federal requirements the Massachusetts legislature enacted G.L. c.119 ss 29b, which requires all judges to certify that the Department of Social Services met the obligation grounded in the federal statute of making reasonable efforts to protect the child short of removing him or her from the parents, and, if the child was removed, making it possible for the child to return home in a timely manner. Rather than “closely examining”, in Massachusetts this grave responsibility is carried out by judges by rubber stamping stacks of 29c forms that simply contain three “yes” or “no” check boxes. In many instances making three check marks is even too much work for Massachusetts judges and they rubber stamp the forms while leaving them blank – never mind actually verifying that the “reasonable efforts” were made. In return for these forms DSS receives it’s federal money.

The three questions are:

1. Continuation in the home is contrary to the well being of the child?

2. Reasonable efforts have been made prior to the placement of the child to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from his/her home?

3. Reasonable efforts have been made to make it possible for the child to return to his parent/guardian?

I discussed this issue a few years ago with Veronica Melendez at the Children’s Bureau (the federal authority). She told me that the federal government was under the impression that all parties were present in the court room at the time of the filing of the 29c’s, so that the parents attorneys had the opportunity to object, rebut, or verify the “reasonable efforts.” In reality, no one sees the federal forms except the judges and a representative of DSS’s main legal department. Attorneys ask us how we ever “got our hands on” the 29c forms, as we have never yet met an attorney who has seen the forms, let alone have been notified of the filing hearing. We even have forms on which the “no” boxes were checked, yet the children were still removed from their homes and federal funds collected for them.

By seizing children illegally in violation of the Title IV-E requirements, then filing false documents in secrecy through the courts to obtain federal funding, CPS is defrauding the federal government with intent. CPS should be subject to investigation and prosecution by the U.S. Attorneys Office. They should be held liable for the restitution of all illegally obtained funds, and prosecuted for perjury, obstruction of justice, and the fraudulent collection of federal funds under the False Statements and Accountability Act of 1996, P.L. 104-292 110 stat 3459, 42 U.S.C.S. 670-679a; P.L. 96-272; C.F.R. part 1356; and Title IV-E. I have discussed this issue with the Inspector Generals Office and they felt it could possible be prosecuted under RICO, yet they have also failed to act, possibly because it isn’t just CPS/DSS who is committing federal fraud, but also the judges who are signing the documents.

In 1988 George Miller, the original architect of P.L. 96-272, and Chairman of the congressionally appointed Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, recognized the fraud being committed in the name of child “protection”, and stated:

“What has been demonstrated here is that you have a system that is simply in contempt. This system has been sued and sued and orders have been issued and they just continue on their merry way. And HHS just continues to look the other way. You have a system that is not only out of control, it’s illegal at this point. What you are really engaged in is state sponsored child abuse

More Video Clips

April 11, 2009

http://www.metacafe.com/w/yt-SPeFECAEqHk/

Child Protective Services can take your children too. CPS has come to believe they are above the law and the Constitution, that they do not need a search warrant to come into your home, label you as a child abuser for any reason and make you a criminal based upon their opinion alone, take your children away in a paddy wagon, and put your kids into foster homes pending a court hearing where CPS will try their best to win and permanently take custody of your kids. If CPS loses, they will continue to fight you, slandering your family and listing you as a child abuser in government databases.

CPS is an abusive government agency spiraling completely out of control. It’s time to shut them down.

The unlawful removal of 468 children from the FLDS ranch in west Texas, has put CPS under the microscope. That case has led others to wonder if they can do that to FLDS children, can CPS do that to my children?

CBS 42 investigative reporter, Nancy Wilson, shows us one family who says the same thing happened to them, and eight years later they are still trying to clear their names.

This is the Gates family, Gary and Melissa have 13 children, 11 of them adopted. They saw a need for kids from a variety of backgrounds who need love in a stable home.

Imagine their surprise when 11 government employees, 6 police officers and 5 CPS workers, showed up on their doorstep.

The school called CPS when they discovered that the Gates pinned a baggy with food wrappers inside the shirt of one of the kids that was caught stealing. It included a two page explanation and who to call if there were questions.

The school did make a phone call, to CPS. Gates was shocked to find CPS workers in his home uninvited, especially when CPS refused to leave.

“How can you take 13 kids? That opened my eyes to a whole new way of government.” – Gary Gates

CPS & Police completely ignored the 4th Amendment Constitutional rights of Americans, entered the Gates home, and took away all 13 of their children, without a court order, after a mere phone call. This is a very similar situation to the FLDS raid, except that the phone call that Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (CPS) used to kidnap the FLDS children was a hoax.

Later in court, the reason CPS gave for taking the Gate’s children was that CPS felt that Mr. Gates was uncooperative with them taking away his children, and his unwillingness to cooperate put the children at risk.

Fortunately, the judge ordered the children returned immediately. An independent psychologist conducted his own review and wrote a glowing report, saying, “I’ve never said this about anyone I have evaluated: I admire the Gates, I would not hesitate to place my own children in their care.”

However, even though the judge ordered the case dismissed, and the independent review was praiseworthy, CPS did not care. CPS called the praiseworthy review disappointing and continued to fight the Gates anyway, listing them in the state’s central registry as child abusers.

Even though the Gates were innocent, CPS claims that because their opinion is that the the father emotionally emotionally abused one child by punishing him, and since all the kids saw it, that equals 13 counts of abuse. And, because the wife did not stop it, that equals another 13 counts of abuse for a grand total of 26 counts of child abuse.

The Gates were never charged with any crime, they are guilty based solely on the opinion of CPS.

The Gates have spent the past 8 years and $175,000 trying to get their names removed from the child abuser registry after CPS unjustly listed them.

CPS’ unlawful and massive FLDS raid of the polygamist community’s children may actually result in more Americans becoming aware of these abuses within CPS and the government.

U.S. politicians, such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, George Bush, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, do not represent any true change for 2008 elections or US government.

One of the few congressmen consistently standing up for and voting for the Constitution, the rights of the people, and liberty, is Republican Congressman Ron Paul. If you don’t know who he is, take some time to watch some of his videos on YouTube, or read his book The Revolution, you just may be amazed like the rest of us. It’s time to take America back and live by the Constitution, before it collapses as a bankrupt empire.
1. Categories: News & Events
Comments on
Child Protective Services: CPS & Police Abuse Constitution, Invading Homes, Kidnapping Children, Ignoring Courts, and Criminaliz
15 Comments | Add Comment
• cps sucks donkey …
cps sucks donkey boner! these people do whatever they want and it doesn’t matter what outside professionals say you’re good parents they don’t care! they just want to be right, and go after the thousands of dollars in bonuses these cases give them. they wanna go to hawaii, who gives a s**t who’s lives they ruin as long as they have their 2 months holidays. makes me sick!
By stopCPSabuse [Affiliate User] 4 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Not only …
Not only unConstitution ,but unAmerican and the fact they can over ride the court system their also Nazi like. Taking children because one Moron who works for CPS says so dont even come close to being a fact. The fact their going to go to Hell for destroying loving familys is more likly.
By wtfcares001 [Affiliate User] 4 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• I think CPS had th …
I think CPS had th right to take the kids from the cult. but not the kids from the gates family.
FLDS is a cult D= they were indicted for sexual abuse to the children so CPS made a good call on that one.
But like all news it is bias. Which is why I dont watch the news.
By Karategata [Affiliate User] 4 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• My organization… …
My organization…watch my channel.
By patiencepoet [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• The news report is …
The news report is biased and fails to mention that emotional abuse can only be proven by a pycholgist.
By crazydan806 [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Fantastic. Everyone …
Fantastic.
Everyone has is starting to fight back against child protection.

This is wonderful news.
CP has to be made accountable.
By UKSecretCourts [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Congratulations to …
Congratulations to these CBS reporters. They are extremely rare indeed. These abuses by CPS have been going on for decades and the secrecy is akin to the nazi holocaust. Are people going to wait until the monsters are knocking on their door when it’s too late?
By firestartersRus [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• I was a Juvenile …
I was a Juvenile sexual/physical abuse detective for 3 years. I began running into CPS corruption in 2000. I fought in court to get these kids back. Not successful. CPS is out of control. I have found the children they are taking are all white and don’t know why. Thank you for helping the El Dorado children!!! Susie
By subiesisters [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Who is Serenah’s …
Who is Serenah’s Angels?
By uo1 [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• This is war… …
This is war…Serenah’s Angels can help!
By patiencepoet [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• ,I feel sorry for …
,I feel sorry for people like this doing great things for teens and to be falsely accused f**k all state governments
By undercovamum [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• this is out of …
this is out of control and they advertise the carers as “carers needed” and they have their own laws its global corruption and a lot of f**ken s**t they need to start doing more investigations like this one abut on a global effort as its like ther tall poppy syndrome,kids are taken unneedlessly and the ones who abuse them have a corrupt way of
By undercovamum [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• NO decent person …
NO decent person would ever let some demon inspired puke come in and kidnap their kids. You know the truth. Don’t ever stand for that.
By freedommv1 [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Can we sue CPS?
Can we sue CPS?
By f8cleopatra [Affiliate User] 5 months ago Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
• Wondering…if you …
Wondering…if you are a family member denied to intervene if you have a right to appeal that judge’s denial to intervene. I’m going through this.

More clips

December 21, 2008

http://www.metacafe.com/w/yt-vctTJhhEUOQ/

 

 

http://www.metacafe.com/w/yt-t4ks1no5MdA/

 

 

Comments on

Child Protective Services: Does It Help or Harm Families?

15 Comments | Add Comment

  • CPS is a corrupt, …

CPS is a corrupt, racketeering industry that kidnaps children from innocent parents, drugs these children by billing Medicaid, and exploits these children through sexual slavery and creating an adoption market for homosexuals. This must be investigated and the criminal authorities prosecuted and imprisoned.

By firestartersRus [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • Come from for Child …

Come from for Child “Protective” Services: Get paid with hard earned tax dollars to be a psychopath who destroys children and innocent parents!

By Tarchomraicer [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • WOW… the system …

WOW… the system is realing be exposed for what it is.
Can you hear the last few gasps?
/gasp /gasp

Stop destroying childrens lives!

By Fighting4Families [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • The Child …

The Child protection racket HARMS families. It traumatizes children, exposes them to predatory professionals and molds them into troubled adults who later fill the prison system. Don’t be fooled people! These videos are nothing more than propaganda.. they KNOW their time is running out

By Stand4Families [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • PROPAGANDA… You …

PROPAGANDA…
You are losing you war of secrecy. The truth is being exposed. The system is crawling with pedophiles and child abusers. Children for funding is destroying the family as is the intent in the popular Social Worker Handbook (The Calhoun Reader) by Arthur Calhoun.

By CASCorruption [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • The system is …

The system is corrupt and children our not your commodity… down with corporate child protection. Child Protection Workers and Lawyers who commit perjury and provide false affadvaits must be jailed.

By Fistandell [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  5 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • Google “Logan Marr” …

Google “Logan Marr” – she was another child, stolen from her mother, and killed by her CPS / foster “mother”. There’s many, many more cases like that.

By CitizensPower [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  6 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • Well, since 5 times …

Well, since 5 times as many children are abused / murdered when they are in “care” it’s pretty obvious: child “protection” is a corrupt evil scam. Don’t get fooled by the “best interests of the child” lie.

By CitizensPower [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  6 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • Social workers are …

Social workers are front liners for the real culprits behind the scenes.

By ShreddedSociety [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  6 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • sick sick more sick

sick sick more sick

By MikeHansonArchives [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  6 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • If anyone can …

If anyone can stomach to watch this far enough, one example was a child taken from the start of life, and at the age of two, “He can say my name, by the way” only tells me just how much the child is being molded by them. Sounds like self promotion rather than family promotion. What does being able to say your name have to do with the family. Well, for those of us who know the truth behind CPS, we know that this vid is intended for the gullable and future victims.

By daaronad [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  7 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • They have said If …

They have said If you have served in combat you have PTSD and you cant have children. over two hundred of us Vets have lost our children to this madness. Our reward for serving our country is the loss of our children. Most of us just screamed in our sleep and the next day CPS takes our children. How can one Gov. agency say PTSD is low enough that that you cant receive compensation but the CPS say’s its bad enough to loose you children forever! Dont serve your country any q’s call 4065912585

By letthelightshine1 [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  7 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • We believe that …

We believe that they are here to help, until you get to know them. Never open your doors to them. Never answer their questions. They will/and do turn it against you and your family. They turn to profit their organization. Don’t be fooled. Families are only a tool for them to use and manipulate to reach monetary gains and bonuses, let alone the power trips that social workers get a high from. A social worker is never wrong. Just ask them.

By daaronad [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  7 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • dont listen to …

dont listen to these people talking there full of s**t cps needs to be taken down

By corenele [Affiliate User] Reply Spam [+0] Moderate Up Moderate Down  7 months ago

  •  
    • 0
  • cps is crap they …

cps is crap they lie bend the truth and they make false statments about what really happens i think they are all bulls**ters how can you live with yourselfs.dont listen to these people talking there full of s**t.we need to make change with these people and make them acoutable!!

State’s Child Protection Agencies Collude with Judges to Defraud Federal Government

September 14, 2008

State’s Child Protection Agencies Collude with Judges to Defraud Federal Government
© Nev Moore Jan. ‘02

In 1974 Walter Mondale initiated CAPTA (the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act), the legislation that began feeding federal funding into the state’s child welfare agencies. With remarkable foresight Mondale expressed concerns that the legislation could lead to systemic abuse in that the state agencies might over-process children into the system unnecessarily to keep, and increase, the flow of federal dollars. Shortly after CAPTA was enacted there was a dramatic increase in the number of children in foster care, peaking at around 500,000 during the mid-70’s. George Miller, the Chairman of the federal Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, initiated an intensive investigation of the nation’s foster care system after the effects of CAPTA started to become apparent by the soaring numbers of children who were being placed in foster care. An official at the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare admitted to Miller that the government had no idea where many of the nation’s 500,000 foster children where living, what services they were receiving, if any, or if any efforts were being made to reunite them with their families.

To address the obvious free-for-all snatching of children that CAPTA had stimulated, the Committee crafted new federal legislation with the intent of creating accountability and clearer guidelines for the states child welfare agencies. During the crafting of P.L. 96-272 Chairman Miller’s concern was that the federal government was footing the bill for warehousing children in institutions and inappropriate settings without accountability. In 1980 the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act, P.L. 96-272, was enacted. The act included provisions that “reasonable efforts” be made to prevent children from being unnecessarily removed from their homes and placed in foster care. Although CPS has always tried to buffalo the media and the public that they are involved with families due to some sort of horrific child abuse or neglect, there has never been any debate among national policy makers, researchers, and federal agencies that the vast majority of CPS cases are due to poverty or frivolous/social reasons and do not contain elements of real child abuse. If the cases did actually involve acts of abuse they would be criminal, identified and investigated by law enforcement, rather than social workers, and would be prosecuted as such. P.L. 96-272 came into effect partly because Congress determined that a large number of children were being unnecessarily removed from their homes, and, once removed, they were lost in the limbo of foster care for years, many until they just grew too old, when they were then put on the streets at the age of 18.

The Child Welfare League of America testified before a senate subcommittee: “In fact, there were many instances then, as now, of children being removed unnecessarily from their families. It is important to recognize that children are almost always traumatized by removal from their own families.” So, accountability from each states child protection agency was also written in. To receive the federal money the states would have to submit an annual report to the federal government, known as an AFCARS report, that specifically accounts for each child in state care. ACLU Children’s Rights Project attorney, Marcia Robinson Lowry, explained in her testimony to Congress: “As a condition of federal funding, states must have a reasonable information system to identify children in federally-funded state custody.” These requirements were implemented in 1980. Up until 1999 some states were still not filing their federally required AFCARS report to the federal government. According to Jeffrey Locke, former Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Social Services, the excuse to the legislature was that they “couldn’t figure out how to
work their computer system.”

When I called Senator Therese Murray in 1998 to ask how many children had died in foster care in Massachusetts, her aide replied: “We don’t have those statistics.” At that time Senator Murray was the Senate Chair of the Committee on Health & Elderly Affairs, and therefore responsible to oversee the collection and filing of AFCARS data.

The “reasonable efforts” requirements were designed to address these issues by requiring the states child welfare agencies to have specific investigation and assessment policies to minimize frivolous removals, to provide “services” to address and ameliorate conditions that were detrimental to the child’s well-being; to place children with relatives when removal from the home was absolutely necessary; and make efforts to reunite families in a timely fashion. Methods to audit and track compliance with federal requirements were also built in. The states were to establish “citizen review panels” comprised of a specifically designated representation of the population which would include not only members of collateral professional communities involved in child protection, but “parents, foster parents, and former foster children.” Each state was to have at least three citizen review panels. The panels would essentially act as a standing jury of peers and would review CPS cases. Twenty years after P.L. 96- 272 went into effect the citizen review panels have never been established in most states.

Another means of creating accountability was to have the federal authority, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, conduct compliance audits, which are known as Section 427 reviews. The method of enforcement that Congress devised to ensure that the states followed the federal law was to provide incentive funds to the states that documented their compliance with the federal regulations. The states would self-certify compliance, but could be subjected to “periodic” 427 reviews by the Dept. of Health & Human Services. Were the states to find themselves in non-compliance they would simply return the incentive funds. It would seem that providing cash to agencies that are allowed to self-document compliance is a somewhat less than intelligent system. It would be interesting to track down exactly how much money the states child “protective” agencies have returned to the government because they found themselves in non-compliance. Gee, maybe this is rocket science.

Like CAPTA, P.L. 96-272 could only have worked if the federal government demanded compliance and meticulous accountability, and them imposed sanctions for non-compliance. Even better – criminal charges for racketeering for intentional fraud. Mark Soler, director of the National Youth Law Center in California explained:

“The Department of Health & Human Services has failed to promulgate meaningful regulations to implement the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act. It has applied even the minimal federal regulations that were developed in an inconsistent and arbitrary manner, and only token implementation of the laws protecting children.’

Even when HHS finds overwhelming evidence of lack of compliance during 427 reviews, no sanctions are imposed and they continue to keep the fed $$$ pouring in – in violation of their own regulations. Not so much as a slap on the hand or even token admonishment. Certainly explains how CPS developed their arrogance and contempt for any authority – because there is none. Their confidence that they are free from the feds insisting on compliance with the law is well illustrated by the foster care numbers which increased dramatically after CAPTA began feeding federal dollars into the states child protection agencies, then dropped equally dramatically after the enactment of P.L.96-272, which was supposed to create more specific federal regulation and accountability. However, once the state agencies saw that the federal government was not enforcing compliance, the foster care numbers soared once again.

Michael Petit, Deputy Director of the Child Welfare League of America, stated in his testimony before Congress: “A 427 is a meaningless process for most of the states. It represents no kind of sanctions to the states whatsoever for non-compliance.” Marcia Robinson Lowry told Congress: “States are passing HHS audits with systems in which no reasonable person could consider that children are being well treated. It is virtually impossible to fail a 427 audit.”

The initial concept of “reasonable efforts” was the only conclusion that any rational person could come to: rather than disrupt children’s lives, and traumatize them by seizing them from non- abusive situations and placing them with strangers (who are often no better, and sometimes far worse), assist families in overcoming their obstacles and problems by providing support and services. The idea never worked, though, because it has always been more profitable to too many to remove children rather than keep them at home. Rather than offer support and simple, practical services to families CPS forged contracts with vendors. Now private businesses, under the guise of “service providers”, could mushroom into existence knowing that their sugar daddy, CPS, would provide a never-ending flow of coerced clients. The market potential is unlimited – potentially every mother, father, grandparent, and child in the country. Rather than offering practical, meaningful services that are germane to the families circumstances, CPS clients are ordered to engage in “services” with CPS-contracted vendors; special interest groups who are dependent on CPS for their income and profit by maintaining the levels of children in foster care, and whose interests are protected by a bureaucracy intent on securing it’s own survival and protecting unlimited growth.

The extent of which CPS is allowed to continue to operate while being so far out of compliance with the existing state and federal laws is mind boggling. It would be a challenge to find any other agency in our countries history that operated in such gross and blatant violation of the law with absolutely no intervention from the administration. Tens of millions of tax dollars are being squandered on a system that is destroying families and causing lifelong emotional ruin to children – and those are the lucky ones who live through it.

The most egregious area of outright criminal fraud is CPS’s practice of filing their federally required documentation of compliance in secrecy through the courts. The federal foster care reimbursements are channeled through the Title IV-E section of the Social Security Act. Each states child welfare agency enters into a contract with the federal government, which is referred to as their Title IV-E state plan. It is this contract that spells out the responsibilities that CPS must, by law, comply with in order to receive their federal funding. To document compliance with the fed regs CPS must file a form through the courts in each individual case. In Massachusetts these forms are referred to as a “29-C.” 42 U.S. Code, ss 672 reads:

“These requirements are not mere formalities. The Finance Committee of Congress, in preparing its summary for final passage of the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, P.L. 96-272, stated; ` The Committee is aware of allegations that the judicial determination requirement (sic: that a judge makes a determination that a child needs to be removed from the home) can become a mere pro forma exercise in paper shuffling to obtain federal funding. While this could occur in some instances, the Committee is unwilling to accept as a general proposition that the judiciaries of the States would so lightly treat a responsibility placed upon them by federal statute for the protection of children.”

1980 U.S. Code Cong. and Admin. News: “A judicial determination of those efforts (reasonable efforts, as defined in the Act) serves to closely examine, in the case of each individual child, whether reasonable efforts were made to keep the family intact.” In accordance with the federal requirements the Massachusetts legislature enacted G.L. c.119 ss 29b, which requires all judges to certify that the Department of Social Services met the obligation grounded in the federal statute of making reasonable efforts to protect the child short of removing him or her from the parents, and, if the child was removed, making it possible for the child to return home in a timely manner. Rather than “closely examining”, in Massachusetts this grave responsibility is carried out by judges by rubber stamping stacks of 29c forms that simply contain three “yes” or “no” check boxes. In many instances making three check marks is even too much work for Massachusetts judges and they rubber stamp the forms while leaving them blank – never mind actually verifying that the “reasonable efforts” were made. In return for these forms DSS receives it’s federal money.

The three questions are:

1. Continuation in the home is contrary to the well being of the child?

2. Reasonable efforts have been made prior to the placement of the child to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the child from his/her home?

3. Reasonable efforts have been made to make it possible for the child to return to his parent/guardian?

I discussed this issue a few years ago with Veronica Melendez at the Children’s Bureau (the federal authority). She told me that the federal government was under the impression that all parties were present in the court room at the time of the filing of the 29c’s, so that the parents attorneys had the opportunity to object, rebut, or verify the “reasonable efforts.” In reality, no one sees the federal forms except the judges and a representative of DSS’s main legal department. Attorneys ask us how we ever “got our hands on” the 29c forms, as we have never yet met an attorney who has seen the forms, let alone have been notified of the filing hearing. We even have forms on which the “no” boxes were checked, yet the children were still removed from their homes and federal funds collected for them.

By seizing children illegally in violation of the Title IV-E requirements, then filing false documents in secrecy through the courts to obtain federal funding, CPS is defrauding the federal government with intent. CPS should be subject to investigation and prosecution by the U.S. Attorneys Office. They should be held liable for the restitution of all illegally obtained funds, and prosecuted for perjury, obstruction of justice, and the fraudulent collection of federal funds under the False Statements and Accountability Act of 1996, P.L. 104-292 110 stat 3459, 42 U.S.C.S. 670-679a; P.L. 96-272; C.F.R. part 1356; and Title IV-E. I have discussed this issue with the Inspector Generals Office and they felt it could possible be prosecuted under RICO, yet they have also failed to act, possibly because it isn’t just CPS/DSS who is committing federal fraud, but also the judges who are signing the documents.

In 1988 George Miller, the original architect of P.L. 96-272, and Chairman of the congressionally appointed Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families, recognized the fraud being committed in the name of child “protection”, and stated:

“What has been demonstrated here is that you have a system that is simply in contempt. This system has been sued and sued and orders have been issued and they just continue on their merry way. And HHS just continues to look the other way. You have a system that is not only out of control, it’s illegal at this point. What you are really engaged in is state sponsored child abuse.”

From FBI Investigating This CPS Office!, 2008/09/14 at 3:08 PM

Here is something to help you fight CPS

August 25, 2008

Hope this helps.  There will be more to come.  Good luck with CPS or better known as Children Parent Seperaters.  You might also want to visit this web site.     http://ryleepagebliss.wordpress.com/

 

 

This really must be stopped.  Civil right are being broken, families torn apart, children being sold and kidnapped, all with the help of the state and federal government.

 

This strategic and tactical family defense plan is based upon and adapts corporate

Proactive legal defense strategies to family defense application.  Corporate proactive legal defense became a necessity to protect companies from abuse of the legal system by unscrupulous

Individuals engaged in fraud, malice, organized crime, and political extremism.  Families may

Benefit from the same sophisticated proactive defense capabilities to deal with abuse of

Government power by government employees, state contracted service providers, and court

Ordered service providers engaged in fraud, malice, sexual deviance, organized crime, and political extremism.

 

Be advised that attempting to assert your legal rights and the rights of your children

Against the interests of organized criminals and political extremists (CPS), operating under the color of government authority may not be effective and your legal defense measures may bring

You and your family to the attention of these individuals.  They may attempt to make an example

of you.

 

Before conducting anything against CPS, you should consult a qualified attorney licensed to

Practice law in your State to determine if what you are doing complies with State Code

Alternatively, judicial protocol in your State.  You should carefully determine the costs and benefits

To determine which course of action is best for you and your family.  If the family defense plan is

Possible to determine in advance the costs and benefits of using them in your state.

 

The worst-case consequences of having your children removed by criminals or political

Extremists operating under color of government authority are known:

 

1. Your child may be “lost” from State custody and never seen again.

 

2. Your child may be murdered by state employees, contract service providers, or others.

 

3. Your child may be forced into a foster care prostitution ring operated by State

Employees or foster parents.

 

4. Your child may be molested by heterosexuals or homosexual or forced into exploitative

“Relationships” with heterosexuals or homosexuals.

 

5. Your child may be physically abused, emotionally abused, or developmentally impaired

By being provided a nutritionally inadequate diet.

 

You should carefully consider your circumstances and evaluate the cost and benefit

Consequences prior to deciding upon a course of action.

 

After becoming a victim of the “child protection system”,  I  am trying to use the advanced methodology I had developed to map out how the system worked and” reverse engineered” the methods and procedures used by the organized crime and political extremist bureaucracies operating in the mental health, social work, and child protection systems.

 

I am going to try this methodology to case and evidence analysis in false child abuse

allegation cases.  For which my analytical, strategy and tactics development services…  In virtually all these cases, there is no perceived hope for the parents.

 

These analyses will identification of a fundamental problem common to all cases.  In all cases, none of the parents ever engaged thought or planning regarding what would happen when criminals or political extremists gained access to government power and authority and directed it against their family.  When disaster and trauma struck, the only practical course of action available was to react by seeking an attorney or surrendering to the demands of the criminals.

 

Upon having this insight, I will develop a set of procedures that will convert a family’s protective strategy from reactive to proactive.

 

This will be adapted from corporate proactive defense strategy and tactics.  My goal has been to identify a legal means of ending the atrocities being committed against American families by criminals, political extremists, and general sociopaths operating within government agencies and programs.  I will complete this effort and want to make this option available to families through selected family support and defense organizations.

 

Parents should begin thinking like corporate executives to protect the family.  Just like

Corporate executives who must protect their companies from fraud and malice, parents will find

It beneficial to avoid being bankrupted by unnecessary legal expenses traumatized by unwarranted child abuse prosecutions and emotionally scarred for life by the unwarranted termination of parental rights.  This strategic and tactical plan may serve as a starting point for parents who want to become proactive in stopping the destruction of their families

 

The purpose of this Plan is to fight the abuse of government authority by organized criminals, sociopaths, political extremists, and unscrupulous child exploiters.  This Plan relies upon the existence of processes of government.  A complete and proper implementation of

This Plan should force recognition of the existence of these orderly processes and the restoration

Of their use.  If you abandon your responsibilities as a citizen to ensure that our government

Operates as intended by those who framed the Constitution, those who succeed in wresting

Control away from you will certainly abandon you.  If you have any doubts about this, look at what passes for government in Washington, D. C. now.

 

.  If one child has been removed and others remain in the home, the remaining children may still be protected…  It may still be possible to reassert your right to privacy or other rights that have been violated.  Discuss with your attorney to determine what benefits it may be possible to achieve under your specific circumstances.

 

Transition from reactive to proactive legal actions forms.

 

1)      NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

 

2)      NOTICE OF CLAIM, PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NATURAL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, PREVENTIVE, REMEDIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARENTAL RIGHTS

a)      Copies of this form should be kept ready for immediate use in each house, perhaps held on the refrigerator with a magnet.  The entire family should be instructed and rehearsed on its use.  A copy should be handed to any person or law enforcement agent that appears at the door and requests entrance to the residence to investigate a child abuse allegation or any pretext that may be a covert investigation.  This should become part of the training children receive on how to deal with strangers.  “Strangers” should include government officials seeking entrance in the absence of a parent or other adult.  The child should be able to distinguish the use of this form and the NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS card.  This form is to be used when approached in the home if a parent is not present.  The card should be used outside the home or if the child is removed from the residence.  This is an important distinction.  This form invokes parental rights.  The NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS card invokes the legal rights of the child.

 

3)      ADVANCE EXPRESS NOTICE INVOKING CLAIM, PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NATURAL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, PREVENTIVE, REMEDIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, HUMAN AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND ALL OTHER RIGHTS TO WHICH I AM OR MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES

a)      This completed notarized signed form is to be filed with the appropriate legal agent for the state child protection agency.  Service should be verifiable by Certified Mail Return Receipt or by a signed receipt for hand delivery.  For political and public relations purposes, copies should be sent to the Governor, CPS director and an unsigned sample copy to the media.  It is highly advisable that a social movement be started in the State to get as many people as possible to complete and file the form to protect their families from criminals and political extremists with access to government authority.  Remember the numerous horror stories of children who are killed or disappear in State custody, for example Rilya Wilson in Florida who has never been found.  Strength of numbers will be an important factor in determining the outcome.  It is essential this be accepted as a universal necessity and not characterized as extremist or associated with any extremist cause.  It should be compared to the introduction of the prenuptial agreement as a preventive measure to protect rights and prevent costly legal processes.  Remember the legal expenses that have bankrupted families whose children have been wrongfully seized.

 

 

4)      NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS

 

i)        Cards with The full legal name of each child in a family should be written on the blank line of a separate card.  It would be best for the card to then be laminated prior to giving it to the child to use.  The child should be taught and rehearsed to give the card to any school official or agent for the State, such as child protective services or teachers, whenever questions are asked about the family.  This card should be used in conjunction with and supplementary to the NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS form filed with the administrator of each place the child regularly stays or visits outside the home.  The page containing these multiple card forms should be print onto tear-apart business card stock generally available at office supply stores.  This model form page is formatted to print on Avery 5371 Business Card tear-apart pages

 

5)      Post “NO TRESPASSING” sign.

 

i)        Posting a “NO TRESPASSING” sign along the boundary of owned, leased or rented check your State Code for the legal requirements and specifications for a “NO TRESPASSING” sign, such as the minimum height of lettering on the sign, the exact words or alternative marks, the color of the ink or paint, the location and maximum spacing between the signs, distinctions between forest land and non-forest land, who is exempt and other possible details.  Your State Code should also be checked to determine if approval of the owner of leased or rented property is required prior to posting a “NO TRESPASSING” sign.  can be a powerful protective tool that may give you additional rights against persons who enter your property for criminal purpose

ii)        Even someone who may initially appear exempt under State agent classification who subsequently is documented to have been participating in the wrongful removal of children for purposes of filing fraudulent Federal fund claims, insurance fraud, Medicare fraud, or other criminal activity could then be subject to additional provisions of your State Code regarding trespassing for criminal purposes, providing your State Code has such provisions.  Exercise offensive legal avenues to expose fraud, corruption, organized crime, and political extremism in your State child protection system and supporting mental health and social work programs and individuals.  (Listed in order of increasing complexity and time to initiate.)

 

6)      File Federal Data Quality Act challenge to all child abuse related statistics reported to the Federal Government for all purposes.

a)      Obtain list of all Federal grant and reimbursement programs your State Child Protection Agency participates in.

b)      Obtain a list of all weekly, monthly, quarterly, and annual reports your State Child Protection Agency files with the Federal Government.  Obtain a copy of all such reports for past twelve years (necessary to avoid redundant request for one legal option)

c)       Obtain copies of all Child Protection Agency third-party contracts for Obtain copies of Child Protection Agency and umbrella agency Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for the past twelve years

d)      Obtain copies of the complete file for each stock, bond and certificate of deposit (CD) held by the Child Protection Service Agency and its umbrella Agency

e)       Obtain a copy of all Child Protection Agency intra departmental and interdepartmental e-mail for as far back as they are maintained.

f)        Obtain copies of all reports and minutes of the Child Protection Agency Child Death Review Committee,

g)      Including reports on the annual number of deaths and injuries to children held in State custody.  Obtain a copy of the database of therapy service provider claims filed with the Crime Victims Reparation Board for analysis of child abuse related claims filed by therapists and corporations

h)      Check all reports for violation of Federal Data Quality Act Standards and violation of State and Federal criminal statutes regarding falsification of claims and fraud.

 

7)      File Federal Data Quality Act complaints with Federal Agencies as warranted, based upon documented violations.

 

8)      File criminal complaints or initiate civil action against third-party mental health and social work contractors that are businesses under relevant and applicable State code regarding deceptive and unconscionable trade practices where it can be documented evaluation testing was rigged or falsified to produce false positives indicating the need for private or state services.

i)        File qui tam or RICO suit(s) as warranted by evidence of fraud and false claims uncovered during the analysis of the information obtained Obtaining any percentage award(s) of money would, in whole or in part, reimburse the expenditures for implementing the aggressive component of this strategic and tactical plan.

 

9)      Develop an effective public relations program.

i)        Review all evidence uncovered and determine when it should be released, the means of release, and what should be withheld for use under I.B.Organize and maximize the number of State citizens who use the forms listed under I.A.

 

10)  Evaluate your overall public relations problems and devise solutions compatible with your religious, ethical, and political values.

i)        Despite actions based upon a desire for privacy, your current strategy, or lack of one, may be creating a negative public image, invite spectacular exploitation by the media, and may stand in sharp contrast with other religious denominations, groups and families.

ii)       Review your current parenting activities to identify any possible methods that may improve effectiveness consistent with your personal beliefs, political ideology, and ethics and not be legitimately confused with abuse.

iii) Periodic evaluations of methods and procedures is a good idea for families, businesses and organizations


 

NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF PARENTAL RIGHT

 

To: and other school officials and caretakers: This will inform you that my child, should not be searched or interviewed by any government entity or agent, without my prior written consent.  Should any governmental entity or agent request or demand to interview, question, examine, or search my child, you are hereby instructed to contact me immediately at the following telephone numbers:

 

Work:

Home:

Cell phone:

 

Message: Further, please be informed that any expression of consent that I may give will be conditioned on the interview, questioning, examination, or search being video taped in its entirety and upon my having sufficient time to have my attorney present.

 

My child is not authorized to attend or participate in any class, orientation, program, seminar, or individual counseling about child abuse without my prior written consent.

Consent for my child to participate in any child abuse education or other child abuse

Related activities are conditional upon:  pretence on the part of any presenter or false, misleading, or inaccurate information included in any presentation;

Sufficient advance notice for me to review contents of any presentation; the presentation, including any question and answer sessions, being video taped in its entirety.

 

Should any interview, questioning, examination, or search be conducted without my Permission?

 

I will pursue all civil and criminal remedies appropriate and necessary.

 

If you choose to ignore this instruction or, if it is your position that you are not legally bound to follow this instruction, please notify me immediately upon receipt of this declaration.

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

Signature

 

Date

.

 

 

 

Forms are Below
NOTICE OF CLAIM, PRESERVATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NATURAL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, PREVENTIVE, REMEDIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, AND PARENTAL RIGHTS

 

You are hereby notified that I do not relinquish, surrender or agree to the suspension, revocation, curtailment or attenuation of any natural right, primary right, secondary right, preventive right, remedial right, parental right, or any right to which I am entitled or guaranteed under the applicable State and United States constitutions, applicable United Nations human or parental rights accords, and all other international agreements and accords regarding human or parental rights.

 

If I agree to cooperate with you or allow you entrance to my residence or property, it is done so at my sufferance, subject to revocation at any time, without prejudice to any of my rights or the rights of any resident.

 

I specifically reserve the right to refuse you entrance or admission, at any time, without a proper search warrant.  I request to be notified in writing if you are here under any presumption or assertion that any rights to which I or any other resident are entitled or  guaranteed have been suspended or that my or any other resident’s right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty have been suspended or revoked by legislation or administrative policy.

 

Without relinquishing or surrendering any right, I request to be informed in writing of all rights the State agency you represent asserts that I or any other resident still retain and those rights that you assert have been suspended or revoked because of the allegation you are investigating.

 

Further, please be informed that any expression of consent that I may give will be conditioned on all interviews, questioning, examinations, Inspections or searches you conduct being video taped in its entirety and upon my having sufficient time to have my attorney present.

 

 


ADVANCE EXPRESS NOTICE INVOKING CLAIM, PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL NATURAL, PRIMARY, SECONDARY, PREVENTIVE, REMEDIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, HUMAN AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND ALL OTHER RIGHTS TO WHICH I AM OR MAY BE ENTITLED UNDER SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES

 

You are hereby notified that I do not relinquish, surrender or agree to the suspension, revocation, curtailment or attenuation of any natural right, primary right, secondary right, preventive right, remedial right, parental right, human right or any right to which I am entitled or guaranteed under the applicable State and United States constitutions, applicable  United Nations human or parental rights accords, and all other international agreements and accords regarding human or parental rights.

 

If I agree to cooperate with you or allow you entrance to my residence or property upon the occurrence of any future event that may fall within your legal or administrative jurisdiction, it is done so at my sufferance, subject to revocation at any time, without prejudice to any of my rights or the rights of any resident or occupant.  I specifically reserve the right to refuse you entrance or admission, at any time, without a proper search warrant.

 

I request to be notified in writing and in advance if you attempt to enter, whether I am present or not present at the time of your attempt to enter, my property, residence, or place of business under any presumption or assertion that any rights to which I or any other resident or occupant are entitled or guaranteed have been suspended, or that my or any other resident’s or occupant’s right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty have been suspended or revoked by legislation or administrative policy. Without relinquishing or surrendering, any right,

 

I request to be informed in writing and in advance, of all rights the State or federal agency or program you represent asserts that I or any other resident still retain, and those rights that you assert have been suspended or revoked because of the allegation(s) you are investigating.

 

Further, please be informed that any expression of consent that I may give will be conditioned upon each interview, questioning, examination, inspection or search you conduct, without exception, being video taped in its entirety and upon my having sufficient time to have my attorney present.

 

(Notarize below.)  ________________________________

 

Signature

________________________________

Address

________________________________

________________________________

Date

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

 

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

 

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

 

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

 

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY

NOTICE TO GOVERNMENT AGENTS,

I HAVE THE RIGHT TO NOTIFY MY PARENT(S) AND

HAVE THEM PRESENT BEFORE I ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS OR UNDERGO ANY PHYSICAL

EXAMINATIONS.  YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED

THAT I WANT TO CONTACT MY PARENT(S)

AND/OR MY FAMILY ATTORNEY IMMEDIATELY